A Unifying Perspective on Causal World Models: From Observations to Representations to Structure
TL;DR: Connects causal observations, representations, and structure in a unified account of the components needed for causal world models.
TL;DR: Connects causal observations, representations, and structure in a unified account of the components needed for causal world models.
TL;DR: Studies when private causal reports identify a shared causal backbone and what additional information is needed when they do not.
TL;DR: Combines LLM-derived causal knowledge with statistical evidence through argumentation, keeping conflicts visible and inspectable.
TL;DR: Formalises how agents with private causal models can identify and communicate their shared causal backbone.
TL;DR: Uses optimal correction sets to resolve inconsistent causal constraints within argumentative causal discovery.
TL;DR: Models assumption-based argumentation as a heterogeneous graph and learns to predict whether assumptions are accepted.
TL;DR: Introduces gradual semantics for assumption-based argumentation, assigning degrees of acceptability rather than only binary outcomes.
TL;DR: Uses Shapley-inspired scores to make constraint-based causal discovery more robust to noisy conditional-independence evidence.
TL;DR: Explores heterogeneous graph neural networks for predicting credulous acceptance of assumptions in ABA frameworks.
TL;DR: Develops human-centred causal discovery methods that use game-theoretic ideas and argumentation to make AI explanations contestable and trustworthy.
TL;DR: Introduces an argumentation-based causal discovery framework that reconciles conflicting statistical evidence and domain knowledge.
TL;DR: Argues that computational argumentation provides the dialogue, justification, and revision mechanisms needed for genuinely contestable AI.
TL;DR: Surveys contemporary argumentation-for-AI methods, tools, and applications in an openly accessible handbook.
TL;DR: Uses causal discovery and knowledge injection to expose and revise neural-network mechanisms with expert input.
TL;DR: Presents an interactive causal discovery approach in which argumentation lets people inspect and challenge causal conclusions.
TL;DR: Builds argumentative explanations of classifier outputs from causal models, making supporting and opposing reasons explicit.
TL;DR: Transforms causal models into structured argumentative explanations that make the reasons for an outcome explicit.